ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Impact of Pathology Review in Adverse Histological Characteristics and pT Stages of Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer in a Multicenter Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overweight status predicts improved overall survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Cytoreductive nephroureterectomy for treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma initially diagnosed as node-positive.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving Risk Stratification in pT3 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Focus on Invasion Patterns.Cancers · 2025Article
- Central pathology review and its prognostic value in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients: a nationwide multi-institutional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePathology reviews for upper urinary tract cancer (UTUC) remained scarce in the literature. Here, we reported the interobserver variation among the review and local pathologies of featured histologic characteristics for UTUC.
methodsPatients who underwent definitive surgical treatments for UTUC were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility of pathology review. In the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration cohort, 212 cases were reviewed, of which 154 cases were eligible for pathology review. Agreement between original pathology and review pathology was measured by the total percentage of agreement and by simple kappa statistics. The prognostic impact was analyzed by the Cox regression model with the estimation of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsThere were 80 women and 74 men enrolled in this study, and the median age at treatment was 71.7 years. The agreement is moderate agreement for surgical margin status (87.7%; κ = 0.61), tumor grade (82.5%; κ = 0.43), tumor invasiveness (76.6%; κ = 0.45), lymphovascular invasion (70.8%; κ = 0.42) and T stage (67.5%; κ = 0.52). The interobserver agreements for perineural invasion and variant histology identification were slight. Kaplan-Meier analysis for disease-free survival revealed comparable results in local and review pathology for localized (Tis, Ta, T1-2) or advanced T stage (T3-4).
conclusionsPathology review of UTUC had minimal impact on clinical practice based on current available disease treatment guidelines. However, significant interobserver variations were observed in featured adverse histopathological characters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.