Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model to Evaluate the Risk of Bone Metastasis in Kidney Cancer.

Shengtao Dong, Hua Yang, Zhi-Ri Tang, Yuqi Ke, Haosheng Wang, Wenle Li, Kang Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shengtao DongDepartment of Bone and Joint, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Hua YangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhi-Ri TangSchool of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yuqi KeDepartment of Orthopaedics Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Haosheng WangOrthopaedic Medical Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Wenle LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China.
Kang TianDepartment of Bone and Joint, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dalian Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNWuhan University · CNXian Yang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone is a common target of metastasis in kidney cancer, and accurately predicting the risk of bone metastases (BMs) facilitates risk stratification and precision medicine in kidney cancer.

methodsPatients diagnosed with kidney cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to comprise the training group from 2010 to 2017, and the validation group was drawn from our academic medical center. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses explored the statistical relationships between the included variables and BM. Statistically significant risk factors were applied to develop a nomogram. Calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, probability density functions (PDF), and clinical utility curves (CUC) were used to verify the predictive performance. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves demonstrated survival differences between two subgroups of kidney cancer with and without BMs. A convenient web calculator was provided for users

resultsA total of 43,503 patients were recruited in this study, of which 42,650 were training group cases and 853 validation group cases. The variables included in the nomogram were sex, pathological grade, T-stage, N-stage, sequence number, brain metastases, liver metastasis, pulmonary metastasis, histological type, primary site, and laterality. The calibration plots confirmed good agreement between the prediction model and the actual results. The area under the curve (AUC) values in the training and validation groups were 0.952 (95% CI, 0.950-0.954) and 0.836 (95% CI, 0.809-0.860), respectively. Based on CUC, we recommend a threshold probability of 5% to guide the diagnosis of BMs.

conclusionsThe comprehensive predictive tool consisting of nomogram and web calculator contributes to risk stratification which helped clinicians identify high-risk cases and provide personalized treatment options.

Indexed as

bone metastasisnomogrampredictive modelrenal cell carcinomaweb calculator

Identifiers

PMID34900681
PMCPMC8656153
OpenAlexW3215211065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.