Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900616›Full record

ReviewAnnals of global health2021

Policy Considerations to Promote Equitable Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Peru.

Andrea Thoumi, Sarah J Bond, Mary Elizabeth Dotson, Marlee Krieger, Patricia J Garcia, Nirmala Ramanujam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea ThoumiHealth Equity, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, 1201 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2264-6390
Sarah J BondDuke University, 100 Fuqua Drive, Durham, NC 27708, US Margolis Summer Intern, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, US.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-7555
Mary Elizabeth DotsonCenter for Global Women's Health Techologies, Duke University, Gross Hall, 140 Science Drive, Durham NC 27708, US.ORCID 0000-0003-1084-0102
Marlee KriegerCenter for Global Women's Health Technologies, Duke University, Gross Hall, 140 Science Drive, Durham NC 27708, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2782-5788
Patricia J GarciaSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima-Peru, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, Lima 31 SMP, PE.ORCID 0000-0003-3874-2256
Nirmala RamanujamRobert W. Carr, Jr., Distinguished Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Center for Global Women's Health Technologies, Duke University, Gross Hall, 140 Science Drive, Durham NC 27708, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-8415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of death among Peruvian women. Women seeking screening or treatment services experience delays in receiving screening results provided at community clinics or district hospitals, and lack sufficient resources to pay out-of-pocket to travel to the capital city of Lima for specialized treatment. Continued disparities in health outcomes and systemic barriers to accessing services suggest there are gaps between policy measures and implementation. Objectives: We aim to understand why national policies and clinical pathways that are aligned to global standards have been insufficient in improving cervical cancer screening and treatment in Peru, particularly among women who experience systemic exclusion from health services. Methods: We conducted a policy analysis based on a literature review (2005-2020), in Spanish and English, on PubMed, Global Health, Scopus, EconLit, Lilacs, and Scielo using a value-based care framework. Findings: The main barriers included unequal distribution of health infrastructure and health care workforce, and differences in access to health insurance. Additional barriers, including limited political will and support, limit efforts to prioritize the implementation of cervical cancer policies. We propose policy considersations in redesigning payment models, expanding healthcare workforce, generating costing and policy evidence, and reviewing policies for point-of-care technologies. Conclusions and Recommendations: The barriers identified in this literature review are applicable not only to cervical cancer care, but to primary health care in Peru. Systematic policy changes that address root causes of health inequities and are implemented at scale are needed to advance health reform efforts.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth InequitiesHumansPeruPolicy

Identifiers

PMID34900616
PMCPMC8622178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.