Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900513›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental studies and sciences2022

Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic to combat climate change: comparing drivers of individual action in global crises.

Marijn H C Meijers, Christin Scholz, Ragnheiður Heather Torfadóttir, Anke Wonneberger, Marko Markov

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marijn H C MeijersAmsterdam School of Communication Research, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 15791, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 15791, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ragnheiður Heather TorfadóttirDepartment of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 15791, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anke WonnebergerAmsterdam School of Communication Research, Department of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 15791, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marko MarkovDepartment of Communication Science, University of Amsterdam, PO BOX 15791, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and climate change are two global crises that require collective action. Yet, the inertia typically associated with behavior change to limit climate change stands in contrast to the speed associated with behavior change to stop the spread of COVID-19. Identifying the roots of these differences can help us stimulate climate-friendly behaviors. We assessed the extent to which a number of theory-based drivers underlie behaviors aiming to counter COVID-19 and climate change with an online survey (

Indexed as

Behavior changeClimate changeCOVID-19Pro-environmental behavior

Identifiers

PMID34900513
PMCPMC8646344
OpenAlexW4200067823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.