Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900477›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Female Genital Mutilation in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.

Hashim H Almeer, Ali A Almulla, Abdulelah A Almugahwi, Mohamad Z Alzaher, Mustafa M Alshammasi, Ritesh G Menezes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hashim H AlmeerInternal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Ali A AlmullaInternal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Abdulelah A AlmugahwiInternal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Mohamad Z AlzaherInternal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Mustafa M AlshammasiInternal Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Ritesh G MenezesPathology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM) or circumcision refers to the unnecessary procedure that damages or removes the external genitalia of females. It is mostly practiced in African countries and some Asian regions, particularly the Middle East, and is performed because of cultural, religious, and social reasons. FGM can negatively affect the lives of women and lead to devastating consequences, ranging from immediate to long-term complications. These complications can be in the physical, psychological, reproductive, or sexual health domains. In this systematic review, we aim to highlight the prevalence and practice of FGM in Saudi Arabia. We conducted a literature search at PubMed to identify studies related to the practice of FGM reported from Saudi Arabia. The results indicate that FGM can still be found in Saudi Arabia both in Saudi women and non-Saudi residents. Most of the non-Saudi women with FGM were Sudanese, Somali, Eritrean, and Egyptian. FGM is prevalent in regions such as Jeddah and Hali, Al Qunfudhah Governorate, Saudi Arabia. FGM is considered illegal in most countries around the world. However, in Saudi Arabia, there is no clear and specific law against the practice of FGM. More research on the practice of FGM in Saudi Arabia needs to be conducted to get a better grasp of the true nature of the problem in the country, which could potentially lead to specific and clear legislation that would prevent the social evil of FGM in Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

female circumcisionfemale genital cuttingfemale genital mutilationsaudi arabiatrauma

Identifiers

PMID34900477
PMCPMC8649978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.