Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900469›Full record

ReviewCureus2021

Role of Imaging in the Management of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Catarina Silva, Carolina Carneiro, Teresa Margarida Cunha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catarina SilvaRadiology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, PRT.
Carolina CarneiroRadiology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, PRT.
Teresa Margarida CunhaRadiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most frequent gynecological malignancy worldwide with an overall favorable prognosis. However, there is a subgroup of patients with a higher rate of recurrence and worse prognosis who benefit from a specific pre- and post-treatment radiological evaluation that allows the adjustment of the therapeutic attitude towards the biology of the tumor. The main factors that determine high-risk disease are non-endometrioid tumor histology, histopathological grade 3, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), myometrial invasion ≥50%, and cervical stroma involvement. Radiological evaluation helps identify high-risk cases prior to surgical staging and is an important tool both in pre-treatment and in case of clinical recurrence suspicion. As for imaging techniques, both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI can assess local tumor extent while CT and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) help assess lymph nodes and distant metastases. The central purpose of this article is to review the specific factors that determine high-risk endometrial cancer, and the main specificities in the pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation according to the most recent international guidelines.

Indexed as

endometrial cancergynecological cancermripet/ctradiology

Identifiers

PMID34900469
PMCPMC8648287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.