Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900382›Full record

ArticleMycology2021

Fungal interactions induce changes in hyphal morphology and enzyme production.

Samim Dullah, Dibya Jyoti Hazarika, Assma Parveen, Merilin Kakoti, Tanushree Borgohain, Trishnamoni Gautom, Ashok Bhattacharyya, Madhumita Barooah, Robin Chandra Boro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pulmonary Infection Due toOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samim DullahDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Dibya Jyoti HazarikaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Assma ParveenDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Merilin KakotiDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Tanushree BorgohainDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Trishnamoni GautomDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Ashok BhattacharyyaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Madhumita BarooahDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Robin Chandra BoroDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India.
Assam Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, species interacts/competes with one other within their surrounding for food and space and the type of interactions are unique to each species. The interacting partners secrete different metabolites, which may have high importance in human welfare. Fungal-fungal interactions are complex mechanisms that need better understanding. Here, 14 fungal isolates were facilitated in 105 possible combinations to interact on potato dextrose agar. Morphologically, no changes were observed when the same fungal isolates were allowed to interact within them. However, 10 interactions between different fungal isolates showed mutual replacement with each fungus; capturing territory from the other. Contrastingly, 35 interactions resulted into complete replacement as one of the fungi was inhibited by rapid growth of the other fungus. In 46 interactions, formation of barrage was observed leading to deadlock type of interaction wherein both fungi have restricted growth. To study in details about the barrage formation, two fungal interactions were taken (i)

Indexed as

Barrage formationdeadlockfungal–fungal interactionmetabolitescanning electron microscopyTrametes

Identifiers

PMID34900382
PMCPMC8654418
OpenAlexW3172750364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.