Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900138›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021

MUfoldQA_G: High-accuracy protein model QA via retraining and transformation.

Wenbo Wang, Junlin Wang, Zhaoyu Li, Dong Xu, Yi Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenbo WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Junlin WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Zhaoyu LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Dong XuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Yi ShangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

Development of MUFOLD for Building High-Accuracy Protein Structure ModelsR01GM100701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XU, DONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein tertiary structure prediction is an active research area and has attracted significant attention recently due to the success of AlphaFold from DeepMind. Methods capable of accurately evaluating the quality of predicted models are of great importance. In the past, although many model quality assessment (QA) methods have been developed, their accuracies are not consistently high across different QA performance metrics for diverse target proteins. In this paper, we propose MUfoldQA_G, a new multi-model QA method that aims at simultaneously optimizing Pearson correlation and average GDT-TS difference, two commonly used QA performance metrics. This method is based on two new algorithms MUfoldQA_Gp and MUfoldQA_Gr. MUfoldQA_Gp uses a new technique to combine information from protein templates and reference protein models to maximize the Pearson correlation QA metric. MUfoldQA_Gr employs a new machine learning technique that resamples training data and retrains adaptively to learn a consensus model that is better than naïve consensus while minimizing average GDT-TS difference. MUfoldQA_G uses a new method to combine the results of MUfoldQA_Gr and MUfoldQA_Gp so that the final QA prediction results achieve low average GDT-TS difference that is close to the results from MUfoldQA_Gr, while maintaining high Pearson correlation that is the same as the results from MUfoldQA_Gp. In CASP14 QA categories, MUfoldQA_G ranked No. 1 in Pearson correlation and No. 2 in average GDT-TS difference.

Indexed as

Multi-model QA methodsProtein model quality assessmentProtein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID34900138
PMCPMC8636996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.