Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34900045›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2021

Newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation for the assessment of analgosedation adequacy in infants treated by mechanical ventilation - a multicenter pilot study.

Wojciech Walas, Ewelina Malinowska, Zenon P Halaba, Tomasz Szczapa, Julita Latka-Grot, Magdalena Rutkowska, Agata Kubiaczyk, Monika Wrońska, Andrzej Piotrowski, Michał Skrzypek and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Pain and heart rate variability in neonates receiving dexmedetomidine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Biomarkers for assessing pain and pain relief in the neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Wojciech WalasDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Ewelina MalinowskaDepartment of Intensive Care and Congenital Malformations of Newborns and Infants, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Zenon P HalabaDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.
Tomasz SzczapaDepartment of Neonatology, Neonatal Biophysical Monitoring and Cardiopulmonary Therapies Research Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Julita Latka-GrotNeonatal Department, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena RutkowskaDepartment of Neonatology, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Agata KubiaczykDepartment of Neonatology, Neonatal Biophysical Monitoring and Cardiopulmonary Therapies Research Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Monika WrońskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej PiotrowskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał SkrzypekDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Bytom, Poland.
Mickael Jean-NoelINSERM CIC-IT 1403, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Iwona MaroszyńskaDepartment of Intensive Care and Congenital Malformations of Newborns and Infants, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Children's Memorial Health Institute · PLPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Opole · PLInserm · FRMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdequate analgosedation is important in infants treated in pediatric/neonatal intensive care units (P/NICUs), because both too deep and insufficient analgosedation is disadvantageous. To assess the severity of pain, several behavioral and behavioral-physiological scales are used, but their usefulness is limited. It is therefore justified to search for additional methods to assess the adequacy of analgosedation in these patients. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the usefulness of Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) in the assessment of analgosedation quality in infants requiring mechanical ventilation, who are treated in P/NICUs. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed simultaneously 180 COMFORT-B assessments and heart rate variability measurements using a NIPE monitor in 30 mechanically ventilated infants receiving analgosedation. A generalized linear mixed model with the logit link function was used in order to perform logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between NIPEi/NIPEm and deep sedation.

resultsThe multivariable logistic regression model showed that NIPEi and NIPEm values were higher when analgosedation was deep as compared to when it was moderate or insufficient (OR (95% CI): NIPEm - 1.065 (1.007-1.126),

conclusionsThe NIPE indexes are significantly higher in patients whose assessment on the behavioral scale indicates deep analgosedation as compared to those in whom it indicates moderate or insufficient analgosedation. Allowing continuous monitoring, the NIPE device may be a valuable assisting tool in the assessment of analgosedation quality in mechanically ventilated newborns and infants.

Indexed as

analgosedationCOMFORT-B scaleheart rate variabilityinfantNewborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluationpain

Identifiers

PMID34900045
PMCPMC8641521
OpenAlexW3140719938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.