Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899997›Full record

ArticleGlobal policy2021

Drone Use for COVID-19 Related Problems: Techno-solutionism and its Societal Implications.

Bruno Oliveira Martins, Chantal Lavallée, Andrea Silkoset

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The foundations of influencing policy and practice: How risk science discourse shaped government action during COVID-19.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2024
    Article
  2. Smart Cities Mission in the Face of COVID: Scope and Scale of 'Smart' COVID Responses in India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruno Oliveira MartinsPeace Research Institute Oslo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-3627
Chantal LavalléeRoyal Military College Saint-Jean.
Andrea SilkosetPeace Research Institute Oslo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drones have been widely used by public authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic for pandemic-related problems. As an innovative tool with a wide range of potentialities, they have been deemed suitable for an exceptional situation marked by the persistence of social distance. Yet, the turn to new technology to solve complex problems is a political decision that has broad societal implications, especially in the context of declared states of emergency. In the article we argue that the extensive use of drones by national authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic has generated a new socio-technical assemblage of actors, technologies and practices. Building on the three main uses of drones as responses to specific pandemic-related challenges (disinfection, delivery, and surveillance), we analyse the actors and the practices involved in this new socio-technical assemblage. From the empirical material, we explore potential effects of drone uses on key issues such as the technology regulatory processes, public acceptance, and security and safety concerns.

Identifiers

PMID34899997
PMCPMC8652566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.