Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899987›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2021

Expert opinion on COVID-19 vaccination and the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.

Peter Rieckmann, Diego Centonze, Gavin Giovannoni, Le H Hua, Celia Oreja-Guevara, Daniel Selchen, Per Soelberg Sørensen, Patrick Vermersch, Heinz Wiendl, Hashem Salloukh and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter RieckmannCenter for Clinical Neuroplasticity, Medical Park Loipl, Bischofswiesen, Germany.
Diego CentonzeUnit of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8390-8545
Gavin GiovannoniBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-1700
Le H HuaCleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Celia Oreja-GuevaraNeurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel SelchenDivision of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Per Soelberg SørensenDanish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrick VermerschUniversité de Lille, INSERM-U1172, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Fédératif Hospitalo-Universitaire Precise, Lille, France.
Heinz WiendlDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hashem SalloukhAres Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland (an affiliate of Merck KGaA).
Bassem YamoutNeurology Institute, Harley Street Medical Center, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2540-6651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGaps in current evidence and guidance leave clinicians with unanswered questions on the use of cladribine tablets for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular relating to COVID-19 vaccination.

objectiveWe describe a consensus-based program led by international MS experts with the aim of supplementing current guidelines and treatment labels by providing timely recommendations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice.

methodsA steering committee (SC) of 10 international MS experts identified 7 clinical questions to answer concerning the use of cladribine tablets and COVID-19 vaccination, which addressed issues relating to patient selection, timing and efficacy, and safety. Clinical recommendations to address each question were drafted using available evidence combined with expert opinion from the SC. An extended faculty of 28 MS experts, representing 19 countries, in addition to the 10 SC members, voted on the recommendations. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when ⩾75% of respondents expressed an agreement score of 7-9, on a 9-point scale.

resultsConsensus was achieved on all 13 recommendations. Clinical recommendations are provided on whether all patients with MS receiving cladribine tablets should be vaccinated against COVID-19, and whether they should be prioritized; the timing of vaccination around dosing of cladribine tablets (i.e. before and after a treatment course); and the safety of COVID-19 vaccination for these patients.

conclusionThese expert recommendations provide timely guidance on COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving cladribine tablets, which is relevant to everyday clinical practice.

Indexed as

cladribine tabletsconsensusCOVID-19disease-modifying drugsexpert opinionrelapsing multiple sclerosisvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34899987
PMCPMC8655448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.