Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899965›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data.

Kazi Nabiul Alam, Md Shakib Khan, Abdur Rab Dhruba, Mohammad Monirujjaman Khan, Jehad F Al-Amri, Mehedi Masud, Majdi Rawashdeh

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Omicron virus emotions understanding system based on deep learning architecture.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Deep Learning for Ocular Disease Recognition: An Inner-Class Balance.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kazi Nabiul AlamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-9789
Md Shakib KhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3692
Abdur Rab DhrubaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-8926
Mohammad Monirujjaman KhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-8820
Jehad F Al-AmriDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, P. O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6758-5443
Mehedi MasudDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6019-7245
Majdi RawashdehDepartment of Business Information Technology, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, P. O. Box 1438, Amman 11941, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1103-6952
North South University · BDTaif University · SAPrincess Sumaya University for Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating effect on many people, creating severe anxiety, fear, and complicated feelings or emotions. After the initiation of vaccinations against coronavirus, people's feelings have become more diverse and complex. Our aim is to understand and unravel their sentiments in this research using deep learning techniques. Social media is currently the best way to express feelings and emotions, and with the help of Twitter, one can have a better idea of what is trending and going on in people's minds. Our motivation for this research was to understand the diverse sentiments of people regarding the vaccination process. In this research, the timeline of the collected tweets was from December 21 to July21. The tweets contained information about the most common vaccines available recently from across the world. The sentiments of people regarding vaccines of all sorts were assessed using the natural language processing (NLP) tool, Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoner (VADER). Initializing the polarities of the obtained sentiments into three groups (positive, negative, and neutral) helped us visualize the overall scenario; our findings included 33.96% positive, 17.55% negative, and 48.49% neutral responses. In addition, we included our analysis of the timeline of the tweets in this research, as sentiments fluctuated over time. A recurrent neural network- (RNN-) oriented architecture, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), was used to assess the performance of the predictive models, with LSTM achieving an accuracy of 90.59% and Bi-LSTM achieving 90.83%. Other performance metrics such as precision,, F1-score, and a confusion matrix were also used to validate our models and findings more effectively. This study improves understanding of the public's opinion on COVID-19 vaccines and supports the aim of eradicating coronavirus from the world.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesDeep LearningSentiment AnalysisSocial MediaAttitudeAttitude to HealthCOVID-19Databases, FactualHumansLanguageModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerPublic OpinionReproducibility of ResultsVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34899965
PMCPMC8660217
OpenAlexW4200266487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.