Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899387›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Antihypertensive Treatment and Central Arterial Hemodynamics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yi-Bang Cheng, Jia-Hui Xia, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress in central aortic pressure estimation algorithms].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Central hypertension is a non-negligible cardiovascular risk factor.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Bang ChengShanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Hui XiaShanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan LiShanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ji-Guang WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, National Research Centre for Translational Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Institute of Hypertension · CNRuijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

antihypertensive treatmentaugmentation indexcentral blood pressuredrugrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34899387
PMCPMC8652138
OpenAlexW3217546355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.