ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2021
Auditory Information Accelerates the Visuomotor Reaction Speed of Elite Badminton Players in Multisensory Environments.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a Visual Reaction Training System on Footwork Agility, Reaction Time, and Movement Performance in U12 Badminton Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
- Relative Device-Output Music Intensity and Virtual-Reality-Based Postural Control in Trained Athletes.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Badminton Players' Expert Advantage in Anticipation Based on Visual and Auditory Cues: Evidence from the Drift Diffusion Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessment of Learning Styles and Reaction Times Among Health Care Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Impact of Mental Fatigue on Decision-Making Abilities, Visual Search Strategies, and Simple Reaction Time in Handball Players: A Randomized Crossover Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuro-cortical signatures of attention in uni- and multi-sensory audio-visual processing in children.Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Psychomotor and Basic Cognitive Abilities in Professional Athletes: A Systematic Review.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Review
- Instrument for Evaluation and Training of Decision Making in Dual Tasks in Soccer: Validation and Application.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- High and low pitch sound stimuli effects on heart-brain coupling.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although vision is the dominating sensory system in sports, many situations require multisensory integration. Faster processing of auditory information in the brain may facilitate time-critical abilities such as reaction speed however previous research was limited by generic auditory and visual stimuli that did not consider audio-visual characteristics in ecologically valid environments. This study investigated the reaction speed in response to sport-specific monosensory (visual and auditory) and multisensory (audio-visual) stimulation. Neurophysiological analyses identified the neural processes contributing to differences in reaction speed. Nineteen elite badminton players participated in this study. In a first recording phase, the sound profile and shuttle speed of smash and drop strokes were identified on a badminton court using high-speed video cameras and binaural recordings. The speed and sound characteristics were transferred into auditory and visual stimuli and presented in a lab-based experiment, where participants reacted in response to sport-specific monosensory or multisensory stimulation. Auditory signal presentation was delayed by 26 ms to account for realistic audio-visual signal interaction on the court. N1 and N2 event-related potentials as indicators of auditory and visual information perception/processing, respectively were identified using a 64-channel EEG. Despite the 26 ms delay, auditory reactions were significantly faster than visual reactions (236.6 ms vs. 287.7 ms,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.