Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899207›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2021

Delay Discounting in Established and Proposed Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sarah Weinsztok, Sarah Brassard, Iris Balodis, Laura E Martin, Michael Amlung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reward Processing in Binge Eating and Harmful Drinking: A Systematic Review.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analytic Assessment of Unpredictability and Disordered Eating.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Motivation Profiles Towards Academic Reading, Substance-Related and Problematic Behaviors in Future Teachers.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  8. Delay-probability asymmetry in discounting: An anomaly in multiattribute choice.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Study of Delay Discounting Rates in Alcohol and Opioid Dependence in Northern India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah WeinsztokCofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Sarah BrassardPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, United States.
Iris BalodisPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, United States.
Laura E MartinCofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Michael AmlungCofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steep delay discounting, or a greater preference for smaller-immediate rewards over larger-delayed rewards, is a common phenomenon across a range of substance use and psychiatric disorders. Non-substance behavioral addictions (e.g., gambling disorder, internet gaming disorder, food addiction) are of increasing interest in delay discounting research. Individual studies have reported steeper discounting in people exhibiting various behavioral addictions compared to controls or significant correlations between discounting and behavioral addiction scales; however, not all studies have found significant effects. To synthesize the published research in this area and identify priorities for future research, we conducted a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (following PRISMA guidelines) of delay discounting studies across a range of behavioral addiction categories. The final sample included 78 studies, yielding 87 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. For studies with categorical designs, we found statistically significant, medium-to-large effect sizes for gambling disorder (Cohen's

Indexed as

behavioral addictionbehavioral economicsdelay discountingmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34899207
PMCPMC8661136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.