ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2021
Block Phenomena During Electric Micro-Stimulation of Pyramidal Cells and Retinal Ganglion Cells.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electric micro-stimulation of the nervous system is a means to restore various body functions. The stimulus amplitude necessary to generate action potentials, the lower threshold (LT), is well characterized for many neuronal populations. However, electric overstimulation above an upper threshold (UT) prevents action potential generation and therefore hinders optimal neuro-rehabilitation. Previous studies demonstrated the impact of the UT in micro-stimulation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). The observed phenomenon is mostly explained by (i) reversed sodium ion flow in the soma membrane, and (ii) anodal surround block that hinders spike conduction in strongly hyperpolarized regions of the axon at high stimulus intensities. However, up to now, no detailed study of the nature of these phenomena has been presented, particularly for different cell types. Here, we present computational analyses of LT and UT for layer 5 pyramidal cells (PCs) as well as alpha RGCs. Model neurons were stimulated in close vicinity to the cell body and LTs and UTs as well as the ratio UT/LT were compared. Aside from a simple point source electrode and monophasic stimuli also realistic electrode and pulse configurations were examined. The analysis showed: (i) in RGCs, the soma contributed to action potential initiation and block for small electrode distances, whereas in PCs the soma played no role in LTs or UTs. (ii) In both cell types, action potential always initiated within the axon initial segment at LT. (iii) In contrast to a complete block of spike conductance at UT that occurred in RGCs, an incomplete block of spiking appeared in PC axon collaterals. (iv) PC axon collateral arrangement influenced UTs but had small impact on LTs. (v) Population responses of RGCs change from circular regions of activation to ring-shaped patterns for increasing stimulus amplitude. A better understanding of the stimulation window that can reliably activate target neurons will benefit the future development of neuroprostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.