Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899072›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary ecology research2019

Efficient CRISPR-Cas9 editing of major evolutionary loci in sticklebacks.

Julia I Wucherpfennig, Craig T Miller, David M Kingsley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary ecology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The genetic basis of novel trait gain in walking fish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Speciation and adaptation research meets genome editing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  15. Longer or shorter spines: Reciprocal trait evolution in stickleback via triallelic regulatory changes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Fitness maps to a large-effect locus in introduced stickleback populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia I WucherpfennigDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5329, USA.
Craig T MillerDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
David M KingsleyDepartment of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5329, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
Development Genetics of Tooth Number Variation in SticklebacksR01DE021475 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MILLER, CRAIG THOMAS · 2011 to 2025
$5.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021475NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStickleback fish are widely used to study the genetic and ecological basis of phenotypic evolution. Although several major loci have now been identified that contribute to evolutionary differences between wild populations, further study of the phenotypes associated with particular genes and mutations has been limited by the difficulty of generating targeted mutations at precise locations in the stickleback genome. APPROACH AND

aimsWe compared different methods of expressing single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and Cas9 activity in fertilized stickleback eggs. We used an easily scored pigmentation gene (

resultsTargeted deletions were successfully induced at each target locus by co-injecting one-cell stage stickleback embryos with either

conclusionCRISPR-Cas9 approaches can be used to induce germline mutations in key evolutionary loci in sticklebacks. Targeted coding region mutations confirm an important role for

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9EDAgenome editingKITLGSLC24A5stickleback

Identifiers

PMID34899072
PMCPMC8664273
OpenAlexW4206866113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.