Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34899014›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2022

Predictors of healthcare workers' intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: A cross sectional study from Saudi Arabia.

Samir Ibrahim Arif, Ahmed Mohammed Aldukhail, Meshari Dhaifallah Albaqami, Rodella Cabauatan Silvano, Maher A Titi, Bandar I Arif, Yasser S Amer, Hayfaa Wahabi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Samir Ibrahim ArifArab Board Family Medicine ARBFM, College of Medicine and University Hospitals, King Saud University Medical City, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Mohammed AldukhailSaudi Federation of Sports Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meshari Dhaifallah AlbaqamiOccupational Health and Safety Clinic - KSUMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rodella Cabauatan SilvanoBachelor of Science in Nursing, Philippine Regulation Commission - Registered Nurse, OHSC Nurse, KSUMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maher A TitiResearch Chair of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bandar I ArifCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser S AmerResearch Chair of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hayfaa WahabiResearch Chair of Evidence Based Health Care and Knowledge Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SARoyal Commission Medical Center · SASaudi Heart Association · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination is considered the best way to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and to prevent the complications of the disease. Nevertheless, no awareness campaigns were conducted in Saudi Arabia until March 1, 2021, when the Vaxzevria, or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), vaccine became available.

objectivesThis study aims to determine the factors that can predict healthcare workers' acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2021, in our university tertiary hospital (King Saud University Medical City [KSUMC]), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study targeted potential participants among healthcare workers at KSUMC. We assessed healthcare workers' perceptions and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine via a questionnaire that was distributed via social media applications such as WhatsApp, Twitter, and Google. Participants were informed about the questionnaire before they filled it out, and they were asked to respond to three screening questions before beginning the main questionnaire. These screening questions ensured that the participants met the inclusion criteria. Included participants were over the age of 18, agreed to answer the questions, and were residents of Saudi Arabia. The participants filled out the self-administered questionnaire.

resultsA total of 529 participants completed the questionnaires. All participants were vaccinated, 68% were female, 55% were married, 35% had been working for less than five years, and 65% had a bachelor's degree. More than half of participants had not previously been infected with COVID-19, and most did not interact with COVID-19 patients. More convenient access to the vaccine increased the odds ratio of participant vaccination by 0.39. An increase in the number of vaccinated friends and family members increased the odds ratio of participant vaccination by 0.30. However, COVID- 19 vaccination mandates decreased the odds ratio of participant vaccination by 0.27. The fitted linear regression model explained 32% of the variation observed in the dependent variable, acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine, and the adjusted R squared was 0.32. The fitted regression model was statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval; the p-value was 0.00001.

conclusionIn Saudi Arabia, there is an immense need to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. This requires encouraging more positive beliefs and attitudes regarding vaccination in general and the COVID-19 vaccine in particular.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-sectional studyHealthcareIntentionPredictorsSaudi ArabiaVaccineWorkers

Identifiers

PMID34899014
PMCPMC8645262
OpenAlexW4200014991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.