ReviewJournal of pain research2021
Animal Models of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventive Effects of Avocado/Soybean Unsaponifiables on Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I in a Rat Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Mechanism-based nonopioid analgesic targets.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Enhancement of in vitro and in vivo bone repair performance of decalcified bone/gelma by desferrioxamine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical and Molecular Barriers to Understanding the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nociplastic pain: controversy of the concept.The Korean journal of pain · 2025Review
- NMDA Receptors Regulate Oxidative Damage in Keratinocytes during Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in HaCaT Cells and Male Rats.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pain-resolving immune mechanisms in neuropathic pain.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023Review
- Comparison of Epidemiological Data of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Patients in Relation to Disease Severity-A Retrospective Single-Center Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by spontaneous or evoked regionally-confined pain which is out of proportion to the initial trauma event. The disease can seriously affect the quality of the patients' life, increase the psychological burden, and cause various degrees of disability. Despite the awareness of CRPS among medical practitioners for over a century, its pathogenesis remains unclear, and the available treatment is still unsatisfactory. Effective animal models are the foundation of disease research, which is helpful in understanding the pathogenesis and an in-depth exploration of the appropriate therapeutic approaches. Currently, researchers have established a series of animal models of the disease. There are four main CRPSI animal models: chronic post-ischemic pain (CPIP) model, tibial fracture/cast immobilization model, passive transfer-trauma model, and the needlestick-nerve-injury (NNI) model. The modeling methods of these models are constantly improving over time. In preclinical studies, the interpretation of experimental results and the horizontal comparison between similar studies may be affected by the nature of the experimental animal breeds, sex, diet, and psychology. There is need to facilitate the choice of appropriate animal models and avoid the interference of the factors influencing animal models on the interpretation of research results. The review will provide a basic overview of the influencing factors, modeling methods, and the characteristics of CRPSI animal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.