ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021
Instrument for Assessing Patients' Desirability, Acceptability, and Adherence to Telemedicine in Diabetes: Development, Validity, and Reliability.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding Adherence to Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review of Predictive Factors.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Patient Perspectives on AI- and XR-Enabled Telemedicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Romania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bridging Gaps in Telemedicine Education in Romania to Support Future Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Desirability, Acceptability, and Adherence of Patients with Diabetes to Telemedicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop, test, and validate an instrument for assessing patients' desirability, acceptability, and adherence to telemedicine in diabetes. PATIENTS AND
methodsA group of six experts defined the components that needed to be assessed when developing telemedicine platforms aimed at improving the care of patients with diabetes. The resulting instrument was tested for reliability and construct validity of 114 patients with diabetes and re-tested for reproducibility and consistency on a sub-group of 34 patients. Based on the analysis, the questionnaire's syntax, phrasing, and flow were improved to obtain optimal assessment results.
resultsThe resulting questionnaire has three major sections: one for the main evaluated component (acceptability, desirability, and adherence to telemedicine in diabetes), one for collecting socio-economic and demographical information, and one for diabetes history-related data, respectively. The corresponding data for these sections are collected using 29 questions. The developed instrument has a good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.890), reproducibility (Total score 164 vs 166 points at re-test vs test; Mann-Whitney U p-value = 0.394) and external validity (Spearman's rho = -0.580; p < 0.001 for correlation with Patient's Health Questionnaire -9; and Spearman's rho = -0.516; p < 0.001 for correlation with Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7).
conclusionThe developed questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the patients' acceptability, desirability, and adherence to telemedicine use in diabetes care. In addition, the use of this instrument in the development of telemedicine platforms may improve and optimize their usage by providing valuable information regarding patients' preferences and specific needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.