ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021
Identification of At-risk Pregnant Population for Over-the-Counter Drug Usage in Low-Resource Settings.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective assessment of mental and physical health of maternal near-miss women: A low-middle-income country's experience.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional study on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of pregnant women regarding medication use and restriction during pregnancy.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNearly 1.5 billion people of an Asian country are living their lives without a country-specific over-the-counter (OTC) drug list. A study was planned to assess the understanding and practice of OTC medication consumption in the pregnant population.
methodsA questionnaire-based cross-sectional study evaluating different perspectives on OTC drug consumption was planned in around 500 pregnant women attending tertiary care outpatient antenatal clinics. The association of knowledge, attitude and practice versus indications, knowledge regarding harmful effects possible, reasons for choosing OTC medication, the practice of consulting nonmedical persons and drug interactions with the disease or prescription medications was determined. Regression analysis was performed in statistical software R.
resultsSeven percent (36/516) of pregnant women were found to consume oral antimicrobials without prescription. Local chemist consultation was the most common channel (72.48%) to procure the OTC medicines. Participants with good knowledge score showed an odds ratio (OR) of 1.87 (95% C.I.; 1.28-2.73), 1.6 (95% C.I.; 0.99-2.63), 1.66 (95% C.I.; 1.14-2.42) and 2.66 (95% C.I.; 1.49-4.89) for self-medication encouragement tendency possible, restricting sale of OTC medications, the habit of reading drug leaflets and understanding the potentially harmful effects, with OTC drugs, respectively. Right-attitude participants showed an OR of 1.89 (95% C.I.; 1.29-2.80) and 1.8 (95% C.I.; 1.19-2.76) for identifying knowledge of acetaminophen overdose and liver damage link as well as the disease symptom masking possibility with OTC, respectively. Participants with insufficient knowledge and attitude scores showed an association with more OTC antacid-antiemetics and analgesic use, respectively.
conclusionAntenatal pregnant women need to be guided on avoiding OTC antimicrobial usage. Both obstetricians and regulators have to play an active role in educating pregnant women and contributing to developing country-specific OTC drug lists with the guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-021-01481-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.