ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022
Perioperative right ventricular function and dysfunction in adult cardiac surgery-focused review (part 1-anatomy, pathophysiology, and diagnosis).
Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06539000 (The "RIGHT-SCORE" Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The "RIGHT-SCORE" Study: a Preoperative Risk Score for Postoperative Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Adult Cardiac Surgery
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anesthetic management of a patient with malignant right ventricular tumor and pulmonary tumor embolism secondary to cervical cancer: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Cardiac Anesthesia: Perioperative Assessment and Underlying Mechanisms.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Interventions.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Perioperative management of the vulnerable and failing right ventricle.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Review
- Perioperative Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Abnormalities of the Tricuspid Valve Apparatus in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and failure are now increasingly recognized as an important cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. Although RV dysfunction is common, RV failure is very rare (0.1%) after routine cardiac surgery. However, it occurs in 3% of patients after heart transplantation and in up to 30% of patients after left ventricular assist device implantation. Significant RV failure after cardiac surgery has high mortality. Knowledge of RV anatomy and physiology are important for understanding RV dysfunction and failure. Echocardiography and haemodynamic monitoring are the mainstays in the diagnosis of RV dysfunction and failure. While detailed echocardiography assessment of right heart function has been extensively studied and validated in the elective setting, gross estimation of RV chamber size, function, and some easily obtained quantitative parameters on transesophageal echocardiography are useful in the perioperative setting. However, detailed knowledge of echocardiography parameters is still useful in understanding the differences in contractile pattern, ventriculo-arterial coupling, and interventricular dependence that ensue after open cardiac surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-021-01240-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.