ArticleComputational materials science2022
Identifying Structure-Property Relationships of Micro-Architectured Porous Scaffolds through 3D Printing and Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Computational materials science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Numerical Assessment of Elliptical Pore Orientation and Eccentricity Effects on Charge Transport in Anisotropic Functional Membranes.Membranes · 2025Article
- Enhancement of mechanical properties of nanocellulose xerogels using TEMPO-oxidized fibers.Carbohydrate polymers · 2025Article
- Porous nanoparticles overcome the conventional stiffness-damping tradeoff in polymer nanocomposites.npj soft matter · 2025Article
- A review of bioengineering techniques applied to breast tissue: Mechanical properties, tissue engineering and finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study integrates 3D printing and finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the effect of micro-architectural characteristics on the mechanical properties of porous scaffolds. The studied characteristics include the thickness of the scaffold walls and the number of domains at the cross-section. We use 3D printing to fabricate scaffolds of deliberately designed microstructures to enable strict control of the structures. The longitudinal compressive properties of different scaffolds are first analyzed through experimental testing. Then, FEA is conducted to investigate the mechanical properties and the deformation mechanisms of the scaffolds. We find that decreasing wall thickness leads to failure mechanism transition from wall compression failure to buckling instability. For scaffolds with different wall thicknesses, the failure mechanisms and the critical loads are evaluated using the theory of thin plate buckling. For the characteristic of the number of domains, both experimental and FEA results indicate increasing effective stiffness with increasing domains. Interestingly, we find that with the material properties extracted from a single wall scaffold, the computational models tend to overestimate the effective compression modulus of scaffolds with larger numbers of walls or domains than the experimental data. This observation indicates possible size-dependent material properties in 3D printed structs. Our study demonstrates that integrating experiments and computational modeling can provide fundamental insights into the mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms of micro-architectured scaffolds and unveil unique small-scale material behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.