Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898842›Full record

ArticleCultural anthropology : journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology2021

BE KIND: Negotiating Ethical Proximities in Aotearoa/New Zealand during COVID-19.

Susanna Trnka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cultural anthropology : journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "L'ENFER, C'EST LES AUTRES": Proximity as an Ethical Problem during COVID-19.Cultural anthropology : journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology · 2021
    Article
  4. THE PANDEMICCultural anthropology : journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology · 2021
    Article
  5. PROXEMICS, COVID-19, AND THE ETHICS OF CARE IN SOUTH AFRICA.Cultural anthropology : journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susanna TrnkaUniversity of Auckland.ORCID 0000-0002-4779-8035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizens do not merely respond to states of emergency; in democratic societies, they help constitute them. This essay analyzes New Zealanders' engagements in ethical reasoning during the country's first COVID-19 lockdown. Specifically, I examine how we can understand a variety of public responses to emergency measures-including breaching regulations, threatening rule-breakers, sealing off neighborhoods, and recasting citizen-returnees as "strangers"-as negotiations of ethical proximities focused on keeping appropriately close that which is thought should be near, and keeping distanced that deemed best held afar.

Indexed as

AotearoaCOVID‐19ethicslockdownNew Zealandproxemicsproximitysocial distancingstate‐citizen relationsstate of emergency

Identifiers

PMID34898842
PMCPMC8652794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.