Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898801›Full record

ArticleAphasiology2021

Assessment of alerting, orienting, and executive control in persons with aphasia using the Attention Network Test.

Arianna N LaCroix, McKayla Tully, Corianne Rogalsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aphasiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modulating Complex Sentence Processing in Aphasia Through Attention and Semantic Networks.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arianna N LaCroixCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
McKayla TullyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Corianne RogalskyCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ USA.
Arizona State University · USMidwestern University · US

Funding

Integrative Functions of the Planum TemporaleR01DC009659 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HICKOK, GREGORY, SABERI, KOUROSH · 2009 to 2020
$5.1M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 18PRE33990328NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttention deficits frequently accompany language impairments in aphasia. Most research on attention in aphasia focuses on selective attention measured by executive control tasks such as the color-word Stroop or Erickson flanker. This is despite ample evidence in neurotypical adults indicating the existence of multiple, distinct attention subtypes. Thus, there is a disconnect between the documented attention impairments in persons with aphasia (PWA) and the literature in neurotypical adults indicating that multiple attention components independently modulate an individual's interactions with the world.

aimsThis study aimed to use the well-studied Attention Network Test (ANT) to quantify three subtypes of attention (alerting, orienting, and executive control) in PWA and matched controls. It was hypothesized that significant effects of alerting, orienting, and executive control would be observed in both groups, however, the effects would be reduced in PWA compared to the neurotypical controls. It was additionally expected that alerting, orienting, and executive control would not be correlated with one another in either group. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Twenty-two PWA along with 20 age, gender, and education matched controls completed the ANT. Briefly, the ANT consists of a cued-flanker task where the cues provide information about when and where the flanker executive control task will be presented. The combination of cues and flanker targets embedded within the ANT provides measures of alerting, orienting, and executive control. Participants are expected to respond faster and more accurately to the flanker task when cued as to when and where the task will be presented. OUTCOMES &

resultsIn line with previous work, the control group demonstrated significant effects of alerting, orienting, and executive control. However, we only find significant orienting and executive control effects in the aphasia group. Between-group differences were only identified within orienting attention: the control group benefitted more from the orienting cue than the aphasia group. Additionally, alerting, orienting, and executive control were not correlated in the control group, yet, a relationship between orienting and executive control was observed in the aphasia group.

conclusionsOverall, our findings demonstrate that attention differs between PWA and controls, and that the ANT may provide a more complete picture of attention in aphasia; this may be particularly important when characterizing the relationship between attention and language in aphasia.

Indexed as

aphasiaattentionAttention Network Testexecutive functionstroke

Identifiers

PMID34898801
PMCPMC8654326
OpenAlexW3044397914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.