Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898770›Full record

ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2022

Conditional Independence Test of Failure and Truncation Times: Essential Tool for Method Selection.

Jing Ning, Daewoo Pak, Hong Zhu, Jing Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing NingDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Daewoo PakDivision of Data Science, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea.
Hong ZhuDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jing QinNational Institution of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Research: Use Data from Multiple SourcesR01CA193878 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NING, JING · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conditional independence assumption of truncation and failure times conditioning on covariates is a fundamental and common assumption in the regression analysis of left-truncated and right-censored data. Testing for this assumption is essential to ensure the correct inference on the failure time, but this has often been overlooked in the literature. With consideration of challenges caused by left truncation and right censoring, tests for this conditional independence assumption are developed in which the generalized odds ratio derived from a Cox proportional hazards model on the failure time and the concept of Kendall's tau are combined. Except for the Cox proportional hazards model, no additional model assumptions are imposed, and the distributions of the truncation time and conditioning variables are unspecified. The asymptotic properties of the test statistic are established and an easy implementation for obtaining its distribution is developed. The performance of the proposed test has been evaluated through simulation studies and two real studies.

Indexed as

Conditional generalized odds ratioConditional independenceCox proportional hazards modelLeft truncationRight censoring

Identifiers

PMID34898770
PMCPMC8654042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.