Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898725›Full record

ArticleTechnological forecasting and social change2021

The more you know, the better you act? Institutional communication in Covid-19 crisis management.

Carmine Viola, Pierluigi Toma, Francesco Manta, Marco Benvenuto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technological forecasting and social change, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Health Communication in the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis of Italian Advertisements.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evidence of the Relationship between Social Vulnerability and the Spread of COVID-19 in Urban Spaces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carmine ViolaDipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Pierluigi TomaDipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Francesco MantaDepartment of Management, Finance and Technology, LUM "G. Degennaro" University, Bari, Italy.
Marco BenvenutoDipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plurality of communication channels and the spread of fake news are widespread phenomena in today's society. Those constituted a serious risk during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis management, increasing the confusion among the population. This research aims at assessing the effectiveness of institutional communication amid the management of the Covid-19 pandemic crisis in Italy. We first assessed the phenomenon by building a structured theoretical background stressing the concepts of risk communication, community engagement, and health literacy, highlighting the dynamic and continuously changing scenario of communication strategies, also due to the spread of social media and the mutation of conventional media outlets. We sent a questionnaire to a sample of citizens to assess the impact of three predictors, i.e., the perceived communication, the perceived knowledge, and the perceived information. Based on answers, we built an ordered logit model assigning continuous intervals as values for the dependent variables. The observed results enhanced the crucial role of the phenomenon of health literacy and the impact of asymmetric information on the effectiveness of institutional communication. Education played a fundamental role in understanding communication pillars and building an individual consciousness about health risks prevention.

Indexed as

Community engagementCovid-19Crisis managementHealth literacyInstitutional communicationRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID34898725
PMCPMC8648080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.