Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898621›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Behavior and Fos activation reveal that male and female rats differentially assess affective valence during CTA learning and expression.

Alyssa Bernanke, Elizabeth Burnette, Justine Murphy, Nathaniel Hernandez, Sara Zimmerman, Q David Walker, Rylee Wander, Samantha Sette, Zackery Reavis, Reynold Francis and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Chemogenetic activation of CRF neurons as a model of chronic stress produces sex-specific physiological and behavioral effects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alyssa BernankeDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-4011
Elizabeth BurnetteDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4005-5885
Justine MurphyDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Nathaniel HernandezDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-4095
Sara ZimmermanDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Q David WalkerDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Rylee WanderDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4158-7384
Samantha SetteDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Zackery ReavisDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Reynold FrancisDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Christopher ArmstrongDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Mary-Louise RisherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America.
Cynthia KuhnDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
Alcohol, Puberty, and Adolescent Brain DevelopmentR01AA017621 · NIAAA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUHN, CYNTHIA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017621NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Females are more affected by psychiatric illnesses including eating disorders, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder than males. However, the neural mechanisms mediating these sex differences are poorly understood. Animal models can be useful in exploring such neural mechanisms. Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is a behavioral task that assesses how animals process the competition between associated reinforcing and aversive stimuli in subsequent task performance, a process critical to healthy behavior in many domains. The purpose of the present study was to identify sex differences in this behavior and associated neural responses. We hypothesized that females would value the rewarding stimulus (Boost®) relative to the aversive stimulus (LiCl) more than males in performing CTA. We evaluated behavior (Boost® intake, LiCl-induced behaviors, ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), CTA performance) and Fos activation in relevant brain regions after the acute stimuli [acute Boost® (AB), acute LiCl (AL)] and the context-only task control (COT), Boost® only task (BOT) and Boost®-LiCl task (BLT). Acutely, females drank more Boost® than males but showed similar aversive behaviors after LiCl. Females and males performed CTA similarly. Both sexes produced 55 kHz USVs anticipating BOT and inhibited these calls in the BLT. However, more females emitted both 22 kHz and 55 kHz USVs in the BLT than males: the latter correlated with less CTA. Estrous cycle stage also influenced 55 kHz USVs. Fos responses were similar in males and females after AB or AL. Females engaged the gustatory cortex and ventral tegmental area (VTA) more than males during the BOT and males engaged the amygdala more than females in both the BOT and BLT. Network analysis of correlated Fos responses across brain regions identified two unique networks characterizing the BOT and BLT, in both of which the VTA played a central role. In situ hybridization with RNAscope identified a population of D1-receptor expressing cells in the CeA that responded to Boost® and D2 receptor-expressing cells that responded to LiCl. The present study suggests that males and females differentially process the affective valence of a stimulus to produce the same goal-directed behavior.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalAcoustic StimulationAmygdalaAnimalsFemaleLithium ChlorideMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRatsSex CharacteristicsUltrasonicsLithium ChlorideProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos

Identifiers

PMID34898621
PMCPMC8668140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.