Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898554›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care in Canada: A 12-Year Retrospective Analysis of Three Provinces' Administrative Health Care Data Evaluating Changes over Time.

Amanda Farah Khan, Hsien Seow, Rinku Sutradhar, Stuart Peacock, Kelvin Kar-Wing Chan, Fred Burge, Kim McGrail, Adam Raymakers, Beverley Lawson, Lisa Barbera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Palliative care involvement and intensity of end-of-life care among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a population-based study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Farah KhanTom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8834-4435
Hsien SeowInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-1714
Rinku SutradharInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.
Stuart PeacockFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Kelvin Kar-Wing ChanOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Fred BurgeDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Kim McGrailCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancover, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Adam RaymakersBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancover, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Beverley LawsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Lisa BarberaTom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CABC Cancer Agency · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASimon Fraser University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control 2020-706936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents during 2004-2015 examined end-of-life cancer care quality indicators (QIs) in the provinces of British Columbia (BC), Ontario, and Nova Scotia (NS). These included: emergency department use, in-patient hospitalization, intensive care unit admissions, physician house calls, home care visits, and death experienced in hospital. Ontario saw the greatest 12-year decrease in in-hospital deaths from 52.8% to 41.1%. Hospitalization rates within 30 days of death decreased in Ontario, increased in NS, and remained the same in BC. Ontario's usage of aggressive end-of-life measures changed very little, while BC increased their utilization rates. Supportive care use increased in both NS and Ontario. Those who were male or living in a lower income/smaller community (in Ontario) were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving supportive care. Despite the shift in focus to providing hospice and home care services, approximately 50% of oncology patients are still dying in hospital and 11.7% of patients overall are subject to aggressive care measures that may be out of line with their desire for comfort care. Supportive care use is increasing, but providers must ensure that Canadians are connected to palliative services, as its utilization improves a wide variety of outcomes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsDeathDelivery of Health CareHumansMaleOntarioRetrospective Studiescancer careend of lifehealth services researchpalliative carequality indicators

Identifiers

PMID34898554
PMCPMC8628746
OpenAlexW3212369403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.