Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898553›Full record

SynthesisCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients with Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Christopher Cao, Anthony Le, Matthew Bott, Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Dominique Gossot, Franca Melfi, David H Tian, Allen Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Progress of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher CaoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2495-9158
Anthony LeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Matthew BottThoracic Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Chi-Fu Jeffrey YangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Dominique GossotDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Institut du Thorax Curie-Montsouris, 75014 Paris, France.
Franca MelfiRobotic Multispecialty Center for Surgery Robotic, Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
David H TianDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Allen GuoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUInstitut du Thorax · FRMassachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pisa · ITWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmunotherapy has created a paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overcoming the therapeutic plateau previously achieved by systemic chemotherapy. There is growing interest in the utility of immunotherapy for patients with resectable NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an overview of the existing evidence, with a focus on pathological and radiological response, perioperative clinical outcomes, and long-term survival.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using electronic databases from their dates of inception to August 2021. Pooled data on pathological response, radiological response, and perioperative outcomes were meta-analyzed where possible.

resultsEighteen publications from sixteen studies were identified, involving 548 enrolled patients who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy, of whom 507 underwent surgery. Pathologically, 52% achieved a major pathological response, 24% a complete pathological response, and 20% reported a complete pathological response of both the primary lesion as well as the sampled lymph nodes. Radiologically, 84% of patients had stable disease or partial response. Mortality within 30 days was 0.6%, and morbidities were reported according to grade and frequency.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis demonstrated that neoadjuvant immunotherapy was feasible and safe based on perioperative clinical data and completion rates of surgery within their intended timeframe. The pathological response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy was superior to historical data for patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, whilst surgical and treatment-related adverse events were comparable. The limitations of the study included the heterogenous treatment regimens, lack of long-term follow-up, variations in the reporting of potential prognostic factors, and potential publication bias.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRemission Inductionimmunotherapymeta-analysisneoadjuvant therapynon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID34898553
PMCPMC8628782
OpenAlexW3211696862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.