ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021
Assessment of Digital Pathology Imaging Biomarkers Associated with Breast Cancer Histologic Grade.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of artificial intelligence in breast cancer pathology: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Biomarker-Driven Precision Oncology: Automated Immunohistochemistry Scoring and Emerging Directions in Genitourinary Cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- A computer vision method to evaluate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and multiparametric modeling of neoadjuvant systemic therapy response in breast cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Spatial AI in cancer: mapping immune evasion topology through multi-modal omics and deep learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Detection, localization, and staging of breast cancer lymph node metastasis in digital pathology whole slide images using selective neighborhood attention-based deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Circulating microRNAs and serum proteins in breast cancer patients: Diagnostic relevance and grade-specific expression patterns.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Combining Molecular and Traditional Prognostic Factors: A Holistic Approach to Breast Cancer Prognostication.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploration of the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte score and histological grade in breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Multiplex immunofluorescence and single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveal the spatial cell interaction networks in the non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment.Clinical and translational medicine · 2023Article
- Towards Precision Oncology: Enhancing Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Theragnosis Using Artificial Intelligence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating histologic grade for breast cancer diagnosis is standard and associated with prognostic outcomes. Current challenges include the time required for manual microscopic evaluation and interobserver variability. This study proposes a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) pipeline for grading tumors using artificial intelligence.
methodsThere were 138 patients included in this retrospective study. Breast core biopsy slides were prepared using standard laboratory techniques, digitized, and pre-processed for analysis. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to identify the regions of interest containing malignant cells and to segment tumor nuclei. Imaging-based features associated with spatial parameters were extracted from the segmented regions of interest (ROIs). Clinical datasets and pathologic biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2) were collected from all study subjects. Pathologic, clinical, and imaging-based features were input into machine learning (ML) models to classify histologic grade, and model performances were tested against ground-truth labels at the patient-level. Classification performances were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsMultiparametric feature sets, containing both clinical and imaging-based features, demonstrated high classification performance. Using imaging-derived markers alone, the classification performance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745, while modeling these features with other pathologic biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.836.
conclusionThese results demonstrate an association between tumor nuclear spatial features and tumor grade. If further validated, these systems may be implemented into pathology CADs and can assist pathologists to expeditiously grade tumors at the time of diagnosis and to help guide clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.