ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021
Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Remote Patient Monitoring System With Feedback Mechanisms Using a Smartwatch: Concept, Implementation, and Evaluation Based on the activeDCM Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Trial
- Willingness to Share Smartwatch-Generated Health Data Among a Sample of Adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HEART-Watch: A multimodal physiological dataset from a Google Pixel Watch across different physical states.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Wearable Devices and Data Sharing in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Wearable devices and cardiovascular health: revolutionizing remote monitoring and disease prevention.European heart journal · 2026Review
- Clinician Perspectives on Integrating Mobile Sensor Data Into Cancer Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Sharing Patient-Generated Health Data: The Role of Healthcare Quality, Mistrust, and Discrimination Across Race-Gender Identities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Influencing factors of continuance intention of medical applications for the elderly.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intelligent health management technology use and depressive symptoms among older adults: the serial mediating roles of physical activity and social adaptation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Implementation Framework to Increase Patient Adherence in Clinical Trials Utilizing Wearable Devices.Research square · 2025Article
- Public Attitudes and Predictors of Public Awareness of Personal Digital Health Data Sharing for Research: Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Article
- User Experiences and Attitudes Toward Sharing Wearable Activity Tracker Data with Healthcare Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Veteran Preferences and Willingness to Share Patient-Generated Health Data.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Patterns of willingness to share health data with key stakeholders in US consumers: a latent class analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- What Clinicians Should Tell Patients About Wearable Devices and Data Privacy: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A systematic review of consumers' and healthcare professionals' trust in digital healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Association of Psychological Factors With Willingness to Share Health-Related Data From Technological Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Self-monitoring of health - user viewpoints on gathering data using consumer health technologies during leisure time.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSharing data from wearable health and activity trackers (wearables) with others may improve the health and behavioral outcomes of wearable users by generating social support and improving their ability to manage their health. Investigating individual factors that influence US adults' willingness to share wearable data with different types of individuals may provide insights about the population subgroups that are most or least likely to benefit from wearable interventions. Specifically, it is necessary to identify digital health behaviors potentially associated with willingness to share wearable data given that the use of and engagement with various technologies may broadly influence web-based health information-sharing behaviors.
objectiveThis study aims to identify sociodemographic, health, and digital health behavior correlates of US adults' willingness to share wearable data with health care providers and family or friends.
methodsData for the analytic sample (N=1300) were obtained from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey of the National Cancer Institute. Digital health behavior measures included frequency of wearable device use, use of smartphones or tablets to help communicate with providers, use of social networking sites to share health information, and participation in a web-based health community. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of weighted data examined the associations between digital health behaviors and willingness to share wearable device data, controlling for sociodemographics and health-related characteristics.
resultsMost US adults reported willingness to share wearable data with providers (81.86%) and with family or friends (69.51%). Those who reported higher health self-efficacy (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.51), higher level of trust in providers as a source of health information (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.12-3.49), and higher level of physical activity (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.21-3.31) had greater odds of willingness to share data with providers. In addition, those with a higher frequency of wearable use (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.35-3.43) and those who reported use of smartphones or tablets to help communicate with providers (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09-3.63) had greater odds of willingness to share data with providers. Only higher level of physical activity was associated with greater odds of willingness to share wearable data with family or friends (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.84). Sociodemographic factors were not significantly associated with willingness to share wearable data.
conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that, among US adult wearable users, behavior-related factors, rather than sociodemographic characteristics, are key drivers of willingness to share health information obtained from wearables with others. Moreover, behavioral correlates of willingness to share wearable data are unique to the type of recipient (ie, providers vs family or friends). Future studies could use these findings to inform the development of interventions that aim to improve the use of patient-generated data from wearable devices in health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.