ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2022
Reb1, Cbf1, and Pho4 Bias Histone Sliding and Deposition Away from Their Binding Sites.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Native nucleosome-positioning elements as alternatives to the 601 sequence for nucleosome repositioning studies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- General regulatory factors exert differential effects on nucleosome sliding activity of the ISW1a complex.Biological research · 2024Article
- Hexasomal particles: consequence or also consequential?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Poly(dA:dT) Tracts Differentially Modulate Nucleosome Remodeling Activity of RSC and ISW1a Complexes, Exerting Tract Orientation-Dependent and -Independent Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- In Vitro Mapping of Nucleosome Positions at Base-Pair Resolution Using Ortho-Phenanthroline.Current protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In transcriptionally active genes, nucleosome positions in promoters are regulated by nucleosome-displacing factors (NDFs) and chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Depletion of NDFs or the RSC chromatin remodeler shrinks or abolishes the nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) in promoters, which can suppress gene activation and result in cryptic transcription. Despite their vital cellular functions, how the action of chromatin remodelers may be directly affected by site-specific binding factors like NDFs is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that two NDFs, Reb1 and Cbf1, can direct both Chd1 and RSC chromatin-remodeling enzymes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.