Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34898021›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022

A Comparison Between Unstemmed and Stemmed Constrained Condylar Knee Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

En-Ze Zhao, Wei-Nan Zeng, Zi-Chuan Ding, Zun-Han Liu, Zhen-Yu Luo, Zong-Ke Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

En-Ze Zhao *Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-4267
Wei-Nan Zeng *Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-1968
Zi-Chuan DingDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zun-Han LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-1544
Zhen-Yu LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zong-Ke ZhouDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-4756
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC18039Key Research Development program of Science Technology Department of Sichuan Province 2018SZ0255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare and analyze the clinical outcomes between unstemmed and stemmed constrained condylar knees (CCK) in complex primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of implant survivorship, change in outcome evaluations, and complications.

methodsWe reviewed 156 consecutive patients who received primary TKA using PFC®SIGMA®TC3 (TC3) of constrained condylar design between January 2009 and January 2017 at our institution. After removing patients who met exclusion criteria, 25 patients were identified as unstemmed TC3 cases and 81 as stemmed TC3 cases. Propensity score matching was used to select 25 stemmed cases as a control group for the unstemmed group with comparable preoperative conditions including preoperative demographics, preoperative diagnosis, preoperative range of motion, main reason to use TC3, ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and follow-up duration. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations including Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the range of motion (ROM) were obtained and compared. The instability, periprosthetic fracture, radiolucent lines, polyethylene wear, and heterotrophic ossification were assessed according to the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee. The complications and implant survivorship between the two groups were also recorded and compared.

results3After the index surgery, both groups showed substantial improvement in KSS (knee and function), HSS score, SF-12, and ROM compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in the mean KSS scores (knee and function), HSS score, SF-12, and ROM between the unstemmed and stemmed group postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in the overall complication rate between the two groups. The overall Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.1%-100.0%) at 7 years. No significant difference was found in the survival rate between the unstemmed group (100.0%) and the stemmed group (96.0%) at 7 years (log rank, P = 0.317). The mean duration of follow-up was 7.0 years for unstemmed group and 7.7 years for stemmed group.

conclusionsIn patients with adequate bone stock receiving complex primary TKA, unstemmed CCK could achieve similar clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up as stemmed CCK.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeEquipment DesignHumansKnee JointPropensity ScoreRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeConstrained condylarKnee clinical outcomesStem extensionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34898021
PMCPMC8867417
OpenAlexW4200440537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.