Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34897807›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2022

Improving cancer care locally: Study of a hospital affiliate network model.

Xiang Gao, Mary C Schroeder, Ingrid M Lizarraga, Cheri L Tolle, Timothy W Mullett, Mary E Charlton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  7. The Relationship Between Hospital Safety-Net Burden on Outcomes for High-Volume Thyroid Cancer Surgeons.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Rural comprehensive cancer care: Qualitative analysis of current challenges and opportunities.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiang GaoDepartment of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Mary C SchroederHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-8140
Ingrid M LizarragaDepartment of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Cheri L TolleMarkey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Timothy W MullettMarkey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Mary E CharltonHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
University of Iowa Surgical Oncology Training GrantT32CA148062 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEIGEL, RONALD J · 2010 to 2020
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS T32 CA148062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Affiliate Network (MCCAN) increased access to high-quality cancer care for patients treated in community hospitals across the state by leveraging the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) standards to improve quality among its member sites. This study describes the network activities and services identified as most helpful or effective to its members, as well as the perceived value of joining MCCAN or pursing accreditation.

methodsAn independent research team conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 18 administrators and clinicians from 10 MCCAN hospitals in 2019. Interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was conducted.

findingsNetwork affiliation and CoC accreditation were perceived as helpful to improving quality of care. Having both clinician and administrative champions were key facilitators to achieving CoC standards and made mentoring of member sites a critical activity of the Network. Other components identified as valuable and/or key to the Network's success included providing access to specific CoC-required clinical services (eg, genetic counseling); offering regular performance monitoring and individualized feedback; establishing a culture of quality improvement; and fostering trust within the Network with patient referrals (ie, sending patients back to their local hospital for ongoing care).

conclusionsQuality improvement in community cancer programs is challenging but several strategies were identified by members as valuable and effective. Efforts to disseminate the MCCAN model should focus on identifying the needs of community hospitals, implementing a quality monitoring system, and fostering site-level champions who can be influential drivers of change.

Indexed as

HospitalsNeoplasmsAccreditationCancer Care FacilitiesDelivery of Health CareHumansQuality Improvementcancer care facilitieshealth care quality assuranceintersectoral collaborationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID34897807
PMCPMC9189248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.