ArticleVox sanguinis2022
Clinical practice for outpatients that are chronically red cell dependent: A survey in the Netherlands.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Clinical practice for outpatients that are chronically red cell dependent: A survey in the Netherlands.Vox sanguinis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesLimited data are available to guide physicians on how to determine the red blood cell (RBC) transfusion regimen in chronically transfusion-dependent patients. The lack of clarity on thresholds and targets to be used for transfusion could easily result in either under or over transfusion in these patients. The aim of our survey is to investigate (1) transfusion thresholds; (2) number of RBC units given per transfusion episode; (3) interval between transfusions and (4) patient factors, like decreased cardiac function modulating the former. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe sent a web-based 44-question survey to members of the Dutch Haematology Association.
resultsFifty physicians responded between June and October 2020 (response rate 30%), well-distributed between community and academic hospitals. A wide variation in transfusion strategies was reported: Most patients have transfused 1-2 RBC units (range: 0-3 units) every 2-4 weeks (range: 1-12 weeks) with a median threshold of 8.0 g/dl ranging from 6.4 to 9.6 g/dl. Patient-specific clinical factors that are most frequently reported to influence the transfusion strategy are angina pectoris, cardiac failure and dyspnoea, softer parameters that are of influence are the quality of life and self-sustainability.
conclusionThe results of this survey indicate a broad variation in RBC transfusion strategies in Dutch patients with chronic transfusion dependency. While the current variation in transfusion strategies may be unavoidable in an individualized approach, randomized trials and better defined usable parameters to evaluate the effect of transfusion strategies are required to reach a consensus on how to determine the transfusion strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.