Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34897649›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2022

Discussion on "distributional independent component analysis for diverse neuroimaging modalities" by Ben Wu, Subhadip Pal, Jian Kang, and Ying Guo.

Amanda F Mejia

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amanda F MejiaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 47408, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-8974

Funding

Bayesian methods for cortical surface neuroimaging dataR01EB027119 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MEJIA, AMANDA · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I applaud the authors on their innovative generalized independent component analysis (ICA) framework for neuroimaging data. Although ICA has enjoyed great popularity for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, its applicability to other modalities has been limited because standard ICA algorithms may not be directly applicable to a diversity of data representations. This is particularly true for single-subject structural neuroimaging, where only a single measurement is collected at each location in the brain. The ingenious idea of Wu et al. (2021) is to transform the data to a vector of probabilities via a mixture distribution with K components, which (following a simple transformation to

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingNeuroimagingPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34897649
PMCPMC9188627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.