Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34897602›Full record

ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2021

The lower limit for FEV

Thijs T Wingelaar, Peter-Jan Am van Ooij, Edwin L Endert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Thijs T WingelaarDiving and Submarine Medical Centre, Royal Netherlands Navy, the Netherlands.
Peter-Jan Am van OoijDiving and Submarine Medical Centre, Royal Netherlands Navy, the Netherlands.
Edwin L EndertDiving and Submarine Medical Centre, Royal Netherlands Navy, the Netherlands.
Royal Navy · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterpreting pulmonary function test (PFT) results requires a valid reference set and a cut-off differentiating pathological from physiological pulmonary function; the lower limit of normal (LLN). However, in diving medicine it is unclear whether an LLN of 2.5% (LLN-2.5) or 5% (LLN-5) in healthy subjects constitutes an appropriate cut-off.

methodsAll PFTs performed at the Royal Netherlands Navy Diving Medical Centre between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2021 resulting in a forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV

resultsAnalysis of 2,108 assessments in 814 subjects showed that 83 subjects, 74 men and nine women, mean age 32.4 (SD 8.2) years and height 182 (7.0) cm, had an FVC, FEV

conclusionsUse of LLN-2.5 rather than LLN-5 for FEV

Indexed as

DivingAdultFemaleHumansMaleRespiratory Function TestsRetrospective StudiesSpirometryVital CapacityFitness to diveHealth surveillanceLung functionMilitary diving

Identifiers

PMID34897602
PMCPMC8920896
OpenAlexW4200131807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.