ArticleEuropean journal of hybrid imaging2021
Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI.
Article in European journal of hybrid imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- PET/MRI is superior to PET/CT in detecting oesophago and gastric carcinomas: a meta-analysis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Pooled it
- Staging of esophageal cancer using PET/MRI: a systematic review with head-to-head comparison.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting esophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy with magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The prognostic value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Advanced Imaging for Detection of Foci of Infection in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia- Can a Scan Save Lives?Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background
resultsOut of 26 participants, 22 (20 males; mean ± SD age 68.8 ± 8.7 years) completed 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. Compared to the tumour board, the primary tumour was staged concordantly in 55% (12/22) with PET/MRI and 36% (8/22) with PET/CT; the nodal stage was concordant in 45% (10/22) with PET/MRI and 50% (11/22) with PET/CT. There was no statistical difference in PET/CT and PET/MRI staging performance (p > 0.05, for T and N staging). The staging of distant metastases was concordant with the tumour board in 95% (21/22) with both PET/MRI and PET/CT. Of participants with distant metastatic disease, PET/MRI detected additional metastases in 30% (3/10).
conclusionIn this preliminary study, compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed non-significant higher concordance with T-staging, but no difference with N or M-staging. Additional metastases detected by 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be of additive clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.