Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34897559›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2021

Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores.

Matthieu Schmidt, Bertrand Guidet, Alexandre Demoule, Maharajah Ponnaiah, Muriel Fartoukh, Louis Puybasset, Alain Combes, David Hajage, COVID-ICU Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prediction of COVID-19 Patients' Survival by Deep Learning Approaches.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthieu SchmidtSorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France. matthieu.schmidt@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-4412
Bertrand GuidetSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Alexandre DemouleSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Maharajah PonnaiahSorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Muriel FartoukhSorbonne Université, GRC 30, RESPIRE, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Louis PuybassetCNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Alain CombesSorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 1166, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
David HajageDépartement de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), INSER, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
COVID-ICU Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting outcomes of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is a major challenge to avoid futile, and prolonged ICU stays.

methodsThe objective was to develop predictive survival models for patients with COVID-19 after 1-to-2 weeks in ICU. Based on the COVID-ICU cohort, which prospectively collected characteristics, management, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Machine learning was used to develop dynamic, clinically useful models able to predict 90-day mortality using ICU data collected on day (D) 1, D7 or D14.

resultsSurvival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC)-1, SOSIC-7, and SOSIC-14 scores were constructed with 4244, 2877, and 1349 patients, respectively, randomly assigned to development or test datasets. The three models selected 15 ICU-entry variables recorded on D1, D7, or D14. Cardiovascular, renal, and pulmonary functions on prediction D7 or D14 were among the most heavily weighted inputs for both models. For the test dataset, SOSIC-7's area under the ROC curve was slightly higher (0.80 [0.74-0.86]) than those for SOSIC-1 (0.76 [0.71-0.81]) and SOSIC-14 (0.76 [0.68-0.83]). Similarly, SOSIC-1 and SOSIC-7 had excellent calibration curves, with similar Brier scores for the three models.

conclusionThe SOSIC scores showed that entering 15 to 27 baseline and dynamic clinical parameters into an automatable XGBoost algorithm can potentially accurately predict the likely 90-day mortality post-ICU admission (sosic.shinyapps.io/shiny). Although external SOSIC-score validation is still needed, it is an additional tool to strengthen decisions about life-sustaining treatments and informing family members of likely prognosis.

Indexed as

Acute respiratory distress syndromeCOVID-19Mechanical ventilationOutcomePredictive survival model

Identifiers

PMID34897559
PMCPMC8665857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.