Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34897550›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI physics2021

Artificial intelligence with deep learning in nuclear medicine and radiology.

Milan Decuyper, Jens Maebe, Roel Van Holen, Stefaan Vandenberghe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep learning-based attenuation correction method inRadiological physics and technology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Geometry-invariant abnormality detection.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milan Decuyper *Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jens Maebe *Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Jens.Maebe@UGent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3991-7943
Roel Van HolenDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Stefaan VandenbergheDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

bijzonder onderzoeksfonds 01N04817fonds wetenschappelijk onderzoek 79876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of deep learning in medical imaging has increased rapidly over the past few years, finding applications throughout the entire radiology pipeline, from improved scanner performance to automatic disease detection and diagnosis. These advancements have resulted in a wide variety of deep learning approaches being developed, solving unique challenges for various imaging modalities. This paper provides a review on these developments from a technical point of view, categorizing the different methodologies and summarizing their implementation. We provide an introduction to the design of neural networks and their training procedure, after which we take an extended look at their uses in medical imaging. We cover the different sections of the radiology pipeline, highlighting some influential works and discussing the merits and limitations of deep learning approaches compared to other traditional methods. As such, this review is intended to provide a broad yet concise overview for the interested reader, facilitating adoption and interdisciplinary research of deep learning in the field of medical imaging.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningMedical imagingNuclear medicineRadiology

Identifiers

PMID34897550
PMCPMC8665861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.