ArticleBlood cancer journal2021
JAK2V617F variant allele frequency >50% identifies patients with polycythemia vera at high risk for venous thrombosis.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the treatment of polycythemia vera: a systematic review with single arm meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2025Pooled it
- JAK2-V617F mutation among blood donors: A meta-analysis.Saudi medical journal · 2024Pooled it
- Association of JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates in polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2024Pooled it
- Long-term safety and efficacy of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Japanese patients with polycythemia vera.International journal of hematology · 2024Trial
- Molecular Abnormalities and Associated Clinical Features in Polycythemia Vera.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Defining and predicting disease progression in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a proposed biomarker-driven approach.Leukemia · 2026Review
- A dynamic prognostic model for polycythemia vera long-term outcomes in patients treated with ruxolitinib.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Homozygosity of germ lineBlood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Low-Risk Polycythemia Vera.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Beyond the JAK2 mutation: The inflammasome, clonal stability, and the thrombotic niche in myeloproliferative neoplasms.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- A paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. The initial early use of recombinant interferon-alpha.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Prognostic Scores and Risk Stratification of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: 2026 Updates.Cancers · 2026Review
- Monitoring of JAK2V617F allele burden in patients with essential thrombocythemia.Blood research · 2026Article
- Modern and multidisciplinary care in polycythemia vera.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Toward new therapy end points in polycythemia vera: targeting clonal and inflammatory pathways.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Long-term safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib in Japanese patients with polycythemia vera: a post-marketing study.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Shifting treatment goals in myeloproliferative neoplasms: focusing on polycythemia vera.International journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Clinical and Molecular Insights of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in Myeloproliferative Diseases-Case-Based Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Emerging Significance and Implications of a Durable Complete Molecular Remission in the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Von Willebrand factor and JAK2V617F variant allele frequency predict thrombosis and bleeding in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial (AT) and venous (VT) thrombotic events are the most common complications in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. In this regard, the impact of JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) is still debated. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the impact of JAK2V617F VAF in the context of other established risk factors for thrombosis in a total of 865 2016 WHO-defined PV patients utilizing two independent cohorts: University of Florence (n = 576) as a training cohort and Policlinico Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome (n = 289) as a validation cohort. In the training cohort VT free-survival was significantly shorter in the presence of a JAK2V617F VAF > 50% (HR 4; p < 0.0001), whereas no difference was found for AT (HR 0.9; p = 0.8). Multivariable analysis identified JAK2V617F VAF > 50% (HR 3.8, p = 0.001) and previous VT (HR 2.2; p = 0.04) as independent risk factors for future VT whereas diabetes (HR 2.4; p = 0.02), hyperlipidemia (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) and previous AT (HR 2; p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for future AT. Similarly, JAK2V617F VAF > 50% (HR 2.4; p = 0.01) and previous VT (HR 2.8; p = 0.005) were confirmed as independent predictors of future VT in the validation cohort. Impact of JAK2V617F VAF > 50% on VT was particularly significant in conventional low-risk patients, both in Florence (HR 10.6, p = 0.005) and Rome cohort (HR 4; p = 0.02). In conclusion, we identified JAK2V617F VAF > 50% as an independent strong predictor of VT, supporting that AT and VT are different entities which might require distinct management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.