ArticleNeurotoxicology2022
The association of bone and blood manganese with motor function in Chinese workers.
Article in Neurotoxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Manganese (Mn) is an essential element. However, Mn overexposure is associated with motor dysfunction. This cross-sectional study assessed the association between bone Mn (BnMn) and whole blood Mn (BMn) with motor function in 59 Chinese workers. BnMn and BMn were measured using a transportable in vivo neutron activation analysis system and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, respectively. Motor function (manual coordination, postural sway, postural hand tremor, and fine motor function) was assessed using the Coordination Ability Test System (CATSYS) and the Purdue Pegboard. Relationships between Mn biomarkers and motor test scores were analyzed with linear regression models adjusted for age, education, current employment, and current alcohol consumption. BMn was significantly inversely associated with hand tremor intensity (dominant hand (β=-0.04, 95 % confidence interval (CI):-0.07, -0.01; non-dominant hand β=-0.05, 95 % CI:-0.08, -0.01) hand tremor center frequency (non-dominant hand β=-1.61, 95 % CI:-3.03, -0.19) and positively associated with the Purdue Pegboard Assembly Score (β = 4.58, 95 % CI:1.08, 8.07). BnMn was significantly inversely associated with finger-tapping performance (non-dominant hand β=-0.02, 95 % CI:-0.04,-0.004), mean sway (eyes closed and foam β=-0.68, 95 % CI:-1.31,-0.04), and positively associated with hand tremor center frequency (dominant hand, β = 0.40, 95 % CI:0.002, 0.80). These results suggest BMn is related to better postural hand tremor and fine motor control and BnMn is related to worse motor coordination and postural hand tremor but better (i.e., less) postural sway. The unexpected positive results might be explained by choice of biomarker or confounding by work-related motor activities. Larger, longitudinal studies in this area are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.