Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34896370›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

A novel algorithm for ranking RNA structure candidates.

Anastacia Wienecke, Alain Laederach

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anastacia WieneckeDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alain LaederachDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: alain@unc.edu.

Funding

Non-coding RNA structure change in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseR01HL111527 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Alain T Laederach, Kevin M Weeks · 2012 to 2026
$6.6M
Variant induced RNA structure change in human genetic diseaseR35GM140844 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAEDERACH, ALAIN T · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111527NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA research is advancing at an ever increasing pace. The newest and most state-of-the-art instruments and techniques have made possible the discoveries of new RNAs, and they have carried the field to new frontiers of disease research, vaccine development, therapeutics, and architectonics. Like proteins, RNAs show a marked relationship between structure and function. A deeper grasp of RNAs requires a finer understanding of their elaborate structures. In pursuit of this, cutting-edge experimental and computational structure-probing techniques output several candidate geometries for a given RNA, each of which is perfectly aligned with experimentally determined parameters. Identifying which structure is the most accurate, however, remains a major obstacle. In recent years, several algorithms have been developed for ranking candidate RNA structures in order from most to least probable, though their levels of accuracy and transparency leave room for improvement. Most recently, advances in both areas are demonstrated by rsRNASP, a novel algorithm proposed by Tan et al. rsRNASP is a residue-separation-based statistical potential for three-dimensional structure evaluation, and it outperforms the leading algorithms in the field.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRNANucleic Acid ConformationProteinsSequence Analysis, RNAProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID34896370
PMCPMC8758412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.