ArticleBiophysical journal2022
A novel algorithm for ranking RNA structure candidates.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- rsRNASP1: A distance- and dihedral-dependent statistical potential for RNA 3D structure evaluation.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- cgRNASP: coarse-grained statistical potentials with residue separation for RNA structure evaluation.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- SSRTool: A web tool for evaluating RNA secondary structure predictions based on species-specific functional interpretability.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA research is advancing at an ever increasing pace. The newest and most state-of-the-art instruments and techniques have made possible the discoveries of new RNAs, and they have carried the field to new frontiers of disease research, vaccine development, therapeutics, and architectonics. Like proteins, RNAs show a marked relationship between structure and function. A deeper grasp of RNAs requires a finer understanding of their elaborate structures. In pursuit of this, cutting-edge experimental and computational structure-probing techniques output several candidate geometries for a given RNA, each of which is perfectly aligned with experimentally determined parameters. Identifying which structure is the most accurate, however, remains a major obstacle. In recent years, several algorithms have been developed for ranking candidate RNA structures in order from most to least probable, though their levels of accuracy and transparency leave room for improvement. Most recently, advances in both areas are demonstrated by rsRNASP, a novel algorithm proposed by Tan et al. rsRNASP is a residue-separation-based statistical potential for three-dimensional structure evaluation, and it outperforms the leading algorithms in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.