Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34896059›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2022

Breast biopsy patterns and findings among older women undergoing screening mammography: The role of age and comorbidity.

Shailesh Advani, Linn Abraham, Diana S M Buist, Karla Kerlikowske, Diana L Miglioretti, Brian L Sprague, Louise M Henderson, Tracy Onega, John T Schousboe, Joshua Demb and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shailesh AdvaniDepartment of Oncology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Linn AbrahamKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America.
Diana S M BuistKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America.
Karla KerlikowskeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Diana L MigliorettiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Brian L SpragueDepartment of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Louise M HendersonDepartment of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Tracy OnegaDepartment of Population Health Sciences and the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
John T SchousboeDivision of Research, Health Partners Institute, Bloomington, MN, United States of America.
Joshua DembDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Dongyu ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Louise C WalterDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Christoph I LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Dejana BraithwaiteDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: dbraithwaite@ufl.edu.
Ellen S O'MearaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America. Electronic address: Ellen.S.O'Meara@kp.org.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
Effectiveness of Pre-Operative MRI in Breast Cancer Surgery and OutcomesR01CA149365 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ONEGA, TRACY · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
COMORBIDITY AND SCREENING OUTCOMES AMONG OLDER WOMEN UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHYR01CA207361 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BRAITHWAITE, DEJANA K · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149365NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207361NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLimited evidence exists on the impact of age and comorbidity on biopsy rates and findings among older women. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used data from 170,657 women ages 66-94 enrolled in the United States Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). We estimated one-year rates of biopsy by type (any, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), core or surgical) and yield of the most invasive biopsy finding (benign, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer) by age and comorbidity. Statistical significance was assessed using Wald statistics comparing coefficients estimated from logistic regression models adjusted for age, comorbidity, BCSC registry, and interaction between age and comorbidity.

resultsOf 524,860 screening mammograms, 9830 biopsies were performed following 7930 exams (1.5%) within one year, specifically 5589 core biopsies (1.1%), 3422 (0.7%) surgical biopsies and 819 FNAs (0.2%). Biopsy rates per 1000 screens decreased with age (66-74:15.7, 95%CI:14.8-16.8), 75-84:14.5(13.5-15.6), 85-94:13.2(11.3,15.4), p DISCUSSION: Women aged 66-84 with significant comorbidity in a breast cancer screening population had higher breast biopsy rates and similar rates of invasive breast cancer diagnosis than their counterparts with lower comorbidity. A considerable proportion of these diagnoses may represent overdiagnoses, given the high competing risk of death from non-breast-cancer causes among older women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyComorbidityEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningUnited StatesBiopsyBreast cancerOverdiagnosisOvertreatment

Identifiers

PMID34896059
PMCPMC9450010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.