Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895987›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024

Normative Values of Client-Reported Outcome Measures and Self-Ratings of Six Voice Parameters via the VoiceEvalU8 App.

Elizabeth U Grillo, Brigit Corej, Jeremy Wolfberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth U GrilloDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: egrillo@wcupa.edu.
Brigit CorejDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jeremy WolfbergMassachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions, Speech-Language Pathology Master's Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Effectiveness of Telepractice by Smartphone App Technology in Preventing Voice Problems.R15DC014566 · NIDCD · WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRILLO, ELIZABETH URBAN · 2015 to 2015
$410k
Improving Efficacy of Voice Therapy Concepts via Telepractice and Mobile App TechnologyR15DC019954 · NIDCD · WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRILLO, ELIZABETH URBAN · 2021 to 2021
$387k
NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC014566NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC019954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEcological momentary assessments (EMA) and interventions (EMI) have the potential to assess and offer interventions repeatedly within the client's daily life through mobile app technology. Considering the development of the EMA VoiceEvalU8, the current work provided normative data by comparing traditional (i.e., paper and pencil) and electronic (i.e., VoiceEvalU8 app) administration modalities of client-reported outcome measures and client self-ratings of six voice parameters twice a day in their functional environment.

methodsIn Experiment 1, 50 vocally healthy cisgender women and men completed the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30, VHI-10, and Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) with paper and pencil and the VoiceEvalU8 app. The order of administration modality and perceptual scales was randomized for each participant. In Experiment 2, 104 vocally healthy cisgender women and men used the VoiceEvalU8 app across five days in the morning before talking all day and in the evening after talking all day to self-rate six voice parameters (i.e., overall quality, roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, and loudness) on a scale from 0 - 100. Mann Whitney U tests were run for all measures. Means and standard deviations are reported for descriptive analysis and normative values.

resultsIn Experiment 1, results showed no significant differences between paper and pencil and VoiceEValU8 app administration for the VHI-30, VHI-10, and VFI for vocally healthy adults. Normative values in the current study were consistent with previous literature for the VHI-10 and VFI factor 1 and 2, but slightly higher for the VHI-30 and slightly lower for the VFI factor 3. In Experiment 2, results demonstrated significant differences for all six voice parameters between the morning and evening log sessions. Normative values demonstrated higher self-ratings in the morning as compared to the evening.

conclusionsFor vocally healthy adults, completing the VHI-30, VHI-10, and VFI via paper and pencil and the VoiceEvalU8 app yielded the same results. Client self-ratings of six voice parameters on a scale from 0 - 100 twice a day demonstrated that vocally healthy adults perceived voice to be worse in the morning before talking all day as compared to the evening after talking all day. The results from the current work are promising for EMA via the VoiceEvalU8 app and support the need for continued investigations with clients with voice differences, problems, and/or disorders.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresVoice QualityAdolescentAdultDisability EvaluationEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReference ValuesSelf ReportSpeech AcousticsClient-reported outcome measuresEcological momentary assessmentsNormative dataTelehealthTelepracticeVoice

Identifiers

PMID34895987
PMCPMC9177899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.