ReviewPhysics of life reviews2022
How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
Review in Physics of life reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A Bayesian framework for happiness, health, and psychological well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Deep computational neurophenomenology: a methodological framework for investigating the how of experience.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Lattice physics approaches for neural networks.iScience · 2024Review
- Bayesian Mechanics of Synaptic Learning Under the Free-Energy Principle.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Active Inference in Psychology and Psychiatry: Progress to Date?Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Forced Friends: Why the Free Energy Principle Is Not the New Hamilton's Principle.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Free energy and inference in living systems.Interface focus · 2023Article
- On Bayesian mechanics: a physics of and by beliefs.Interface focus · 2023Article
- Interpersonal attunement in social interactions: fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- A scale-free universal relational information matrix (N-space) reconciles the information problem: N-space as the fabric of reality.Communicative & integrative biology · 2023Article
- On the Inherent Instability of Biocognition: Toward New Probability Models and Statistical Tools.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- George Orwell, objectivity, and the reality behind illusions.Perception · 2022Article
- Asymptotic burnout and homeostatic awakening: a possible solution to the Fermi paradox?Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- The constrained disorder principle defines living organisms and provides a method for correcting disturbed biological systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- The Problem of Meaning: The Free Energy Principle and Artificial Agency.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Some Interesting Observations on the Free Energy Principle.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The free energy principle (FEP) states that any dynamical system can be interpreted as performing Bayesian inference upon its surrounding environment. Although, in theory, the FEP applies to a wide variety of systems, there has been almost no direct exploration or demonstration of the principle in concrete systems. In this work, we examine in depth the assumptions required to derive the FEP in the simplest possible set of systems - weakly-coupled non-equilibrium linear stochastic systems. Specifically, we explore (i) how general the requirements imposed on the statistical structure of a system are and (ii) how informative the FEP is about the behaviour of such systems. We discover that two requirements of the FEP - the Markov blanket condition (i.e. a statistical boundary precluding direct coupling between internal and external states) and stringent restrictions on its solenoidal flows (i.e. tendencies driving a system out of equilibrium) - are only valid for a very narrow space of parameters. Suitable systems require an absence of perception-action asymmetries that is highly unusual for living systems interacting with an environment. More importantly, we observe that a mathematically central step in the argument, connecting the behaviour of a system to variational inference, relies on an implicit equivalence between the dynamics of the average states of a system with the average of the dynamics of those states. This equivalence does not hold in general even for linear stochastic systems, since it requires an effective decoupling from the system's history of interactions. These observations are critical for evaluating the generality and applicability of the FEP and indicate the existence of significant problems of the theory in its current form. These issues make the FEP, as it stands, not straightforwardly applicable to the simple linear systems studied here and suggest that more development is needed before the theory could be applied to the kind of complex systems that describe living and cognitive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.