Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895816›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of internal medicine2022

Management of COVID patients with convalescent plasma: Do we have the final word?

Francesco Menichetti, Marco Falcone, Giusy Tiseo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Convalescent plasma for COVID-19. TSUNAMI is not the final word.European journal of internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Immunotherapy and CRISPR Cas Systems: Potential Cure of COVID-19?Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco MenichettiInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.menichetti@unipi.it.
Marco FalconeInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giusy TiseoInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy with convalescent plasma (CP) has been used in the past in several different infectious diseases and proposed as a potential therapeutic option in patients with COVID-19. However, a clear benefit was never demonstrated and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in different populations of COVID-19 patients showed contrasting results. In general, current evidences suggest that CP in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 does not reduce the progression to severe respiratory failure or death within 30 days. However, currently published RCTs have several limitations. The administration of plasma with low titer of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), the use of suboptimal surrogate serological tests to determine NAbs titer, the delayed administration of CP from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms and the lack of information about antibody titer of recipients before CP infusion, are all limiting factors that may have affected the study results. Thus, a potential benefit of early (within the first 72 h from onset of symptoms), high titer CP in patients with mild COVID-19 (pO2/FiO2>300) cannot be definitively excluded. However, immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies developed from CP demonstrated efficacy in reducing progression to severe COVID-19 and hospitalization and are today recommended in the early phase of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassivePlasmaSARS-CoV-2Convalescent plasmaCOVID-19Disease progressionNeutralizing antibodiesPneumoniaSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34895816
PMCPMC8630688
OpenAlexW3217056818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.