Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895785›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Evaluating public acceptability of a potential Lyme disease vaccine using a population-based, cross-sectional survey in high incidence areas of the United States.

Sarah A Hook, AmberJean P Hansen, Sara A Niesobecki, James I Meek, Jenna K H Bjork, Erin M Kough, Molly S Peterson, Elizabeth K Schiffman, Heather J Rutz, Adam J Rowe and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Lyme Disease Vaccine Paradox.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sarah A HookCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, 3156 Rampart Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. Electronic address: vhx8@cdc.gov.
AmberJean P HansenConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, One Church Street, 7th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Electronic address: amberjean.hansen@yale.edu.
Sara A NiesobeckiConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, One Church Street, 7th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Electronic address: sara.niesobecki@yale.edu.
James I MeekConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, One Church Street, 7th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Electronic address: james.meek@yale.edu.
Jenna K H BjorkMinnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St N, St Paul, MN 55164, USA. Electronic address: jenna.bjork@state.mn.us.
Erin M KoughMinnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St N, St Paul, MN 55164, USA. Electronic address: erin.kough@state.mn.us.
Molly S PetersonMinnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St N, St Paul, MN 55164, USA. Electronic address: molly.peterson@state.mn.us.
Elizabeth K SchiffmanMinnesota Department of Health, 625 Robert St N, St Paul, MN 55164, USA. Electronic address: Elizabeth.schiffman@state.mn.us.
Heather J RutzMaryland Department of Health, 201 W. Preston Street, 3rd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address: heather.rutz@maryland.gov.
Adam J RoweNew York State Department of Health, Empire Plaza, Corning Tower, State St, Albany, NY 12203, USA. Electronic address: adam.rowe@health.ny.gov.
Jennifer L WhiteNew York State Department of Health, Empire Plaza, Corning Tower, State St, Albany, NY 12203, USA. Electronic address: Jennifer.white@health.ny.gov.
Jennifer L PeelColorado State University, Environmental Health Building, 350 W. Lake St., Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: Jennifer.peel@colostate.edu.
Brad J BiggerstaffCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, 3156 Rampart Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. Electronic address: bkb5@cdc.gov.
Alison F HinckleyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-borne Diseases, 3156 Rampart Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. Electronic address: cue0@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLyme disease incidence is increasing, despite current prevention options. New Lyme disease vaccine candidates are in development, however, investigation of the acceptability of a Lyme disease vaccine among potential consumers is needed prior to any vaccine coming to market. We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study to estimate willingness to receive a potential Lyme disease vaccine and factors associated with willingness.

methodsThe web-based survey was administered to a random sample of Connecticut, Maryland, Minnesota, and New York residents June-July 2018. Survey-weighted descriptive statistics were conducted to estimate the proportion willing to receive a potential Lyme disease vaccine. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression models were used to quantify the association of sociodemographic characteristics and Lyme disease vaccine attitudes with willingness to be vaccinated.

resultsSurveys were completed by 3313 respondents (6% response rate). We estimated that 64% of residents were willing to receive a Lyme disease vaccine, while 30% were uncertain and 7% were unwilling. Compared to those who were willing, those who were uncertain were more likely to be parents, adults 45-65 years old, non-White, have less than a bachelor's degree, or have safety concerns about a potential Lyme disease vaccine. Those who were unwilling were also more likely to be non-White, have less than a bachelor's degree, or have safety concerns about a potential Lyme disease vaccine. In addition, the unwilling had low confidence in vaccines in general, had low perceived risk of contracting Lyme disease, and said they would not be influenced by a positive recommendation from a healthcare provider. DISCUSSION: Overall, willingness to receive a Lyme disease vaccine was high. Effective communication by clinicians regarding safety and other vaccine parameters to those groups who are uncertain will be critical for increasing vaccine uptake and reducing Lyme disease incidence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lyme Disease VaccinesAdultAgedConnecticutCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesLyme Disease VaccinesAcceptabilityLyme diseaseTickTickborneVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34895785
PMCPMC11705932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.