Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34895497›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Planetary health2021

COVID-19 wastewater epidemiology: a model to estimate infected populations.

Christopher S McMahan, Stella Self, Lior Rennert, Corey Kalbaugh, David Kriebel, Duane Graves, Cameron Colby, Jessica A Deaver, Sudeep C Popat, Tanju Karanfil and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Planetary health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher S McMahanSchool of Mathematics and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Stella SelfDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Corey KalbaughDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
David KriebelDepartment of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
Duane GravesSiREM, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Cameron ColbyRenewable Water Resources, Greenville, SC, USA.
Jessica A DeaverDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Sudeep C PopatDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Tanju KaranfilDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
David L FreedmanDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Electronic address: dfreedm@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · USServy Institute for Reproductive Endocrinology · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWastewater-based epidemiology provides an opportunity for near real-time, cost-effective monitoring of community-level transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater can identify the presence of COVID-19 in the community, but methods for estimating the numbers of infected individuals on the basis of wastewater RNA concentrations are inadequate.

methodsThis is a wastewater-based epidemiology study using wastewater samples that were collected weekly or twice a week from three sewersheds in South Carolina, USA, between either May 27 or June 16, 2020, and Aug 25, 2020, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. We developed a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) model based on the mass rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the wastewater to predict the number of infected individuals, and have also provided a simplified equation to predict this. Model predictions were compared with the number of confirmed cases identified by the Department of Health and Environmental Control, South Carolina, USA, for the same time period and geographical area.

findingsWe plotted the model predictions for the relationship between mass rate of virus release and numbers of infected individuals, and we validated this prediction on the basis of estimated prevalence from individual testing. A simplified equation to estimate the number of infected individuals fell within the 95% confidence limits of the model. The rate of unreported COVID-19 cases, as estimated by the model, was approximately 11 times that of confirmed cases (ie, ratio of estimated infections for every confirmed case of 10·9, 95% CI 4·2-17·5). This rate aligned well with an independent estimate of 15 infections for every confirmed case in the US state of South Carolina.

interpretationThe SEIR model provides a robust method to estimate the total number of infected individuals in a sewershed on the basis of the mass rate of RNA copies released per day. This approach overcomes some of the limitations associated with individual testing campaigns and thereby provides an additional tool that can be used to inform policy decisions.

fundingClemson University, USA.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2WastewaterRNA, ViralWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34895497
PMCPMC8654376
OpenAlexW4225528856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.